Chelmsford planning statistics
Householder applications decided in the year to June 2026, compared with the rest of England.
How long does planning permission take in Chelmsford?
Chelmsford decided 83.0% of householder applications within 8 weeks without an extension in the year to June 2026, against 62.7% across England.
Chelmsford is highlighted on the map. See on the map
Within 8 weeks, no extension
83.0%
27th of 297
20.3 points faster than England
Granted
90.0%
192nd of 297
0.5 points lower than England
Extension of time
11.2%
22nd of 297
21.1 points lower than England
Decisions (12 months)
729
Chelmsford decided 729 householder applications in the year to June 2026, granting 90.0%.
83.0% were decided within 8 weeks with no extension, against 62.7% across England (27th of 297 for speed).
A further 11.2% were decided under an extension of time agreed with the applicant.
Of 16 householder appeals decided in the same period, 25.0% were allowed.
How quickly decisions are made
Chelmsford against England, share of householder decisions each quarter
- Within 8 weeks, no extension
- Extension of time
- England, within 8 weeks
Show data
| Quarter | Within 8 weeks, no extension | Extension of time | England, within 8 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Q1 | 96.1% | 0.0% | 89.5% |
| 2008 Q2 | 96.8% | 0.0% | 89.4% |
| 2008 Q3 | 95.2% | 0.0% | 89.7% |
| 2008 Q4 | 98.2% | 0.0% | 90.3% |
| 2009 Q1 | 98.4% | 0.0% | 90.3% |
| 2009 Q2 | 98.7% | 0.0% | 91.7% |
| 2009 Q3 | 98.4% | 0.0% | 91.4% |
| 2009 Q4 | 96.0% | 0.0% | 91.0% |
| 2010 Q1 | 96.2% | 0.0% | 88.8% |
| 2010 Q2 | 97.9% | 0.0% | 89.8% |
| 2010 Q3 | 98.1% | 0.0% | 88.4% |
| 2010 Q4 | 96.2% | 0.0% | 87.7% |
| 2011 Q1 | 95.4% | 0.0% | 86.4% |
| 2011 Q2 | 95.9% | 0.0% | 85.9% |
| 2011 Q3 | 96.4% | 0.0% | 84.9% |
| 2011 Q4 | 95.4% | 0.0% | 84.9% |
| 2012 Q1 | 96.3% | 0.0% | 83.7% |
| 2012 Q2 | 94.7% | 0.0% | 84.2% |
| 2012 Q3 | 97.8% | 0.0% | 82.9% |
| 2012 Q4 | 97.3% | 0.0% | 85.2% |
| 2013 Q1 | 97.1% | 0.0% | 85.7% |
| 2013 Q2 | 97.5% | 0.0% | 86.3% |
| 2013 Q3 | 95.9% | 0.0% | 85.3% |
| 2013 Q4 | 97.7% | 0.0% | 86.3% |
| 2014 Q1 | 97.6% | 0.0% | 85.4% |
| 2014 Q2 | 95.3% | 0.0% | 84.9% |
| 2014 Q3 | 93.4% | 0.4% | 82.5% |
| 2014 Q4 | 95.6% | 3.1% | 82.1% |
| 2015 Q1 | 95.6% | 3.5% | 80.4% |
| 2015 Q2 | 86.8% | 7.5% | 80.6% |
| 2015 Q3 | 85.4% | 10.1% | 79.2% |
| 2015 Q4 | 86.8% | 10.1% | 80.0% |
| 2016 Q1 | 86.2% | 10.7% | 78.3% |
| 2016 Q2 | 87.5% | 10.4% | 79.8% |
| 2016 Q3 | 89.4% | 9.0% | 77.7% |
| 2016 Q4 | 86.0% | 11.5% | 78.0% |
| 2017 Q1 | 83.8% | 10.7% | 77.3% |
| 2017 Q2 | 91.0% | 7.7% | 78.5% |
| 2017 Q3 | 84.8% | 11.7% | 76.1% |
| 2017 Q4 | 87.0% | 10.9% | 77.1% |
| 2018 Q1 | 88.4% | 7.9% | 73.7% |
| 2018 Q2 | 85.2% | 8.9% | 74.0% |
| 2018 Q3 | 89.1% | 6.2% | 72.7% |
| 2018 Q4 | 87.9% | 6.8% | 72.7% |
| 2019 Q1 | 84.7% | 7.4% | 69.9% |
| 2019 Q2 | 88.0% | 7.9% | 72.1% |
| 2019 Q3 | 89.2% | 7.7% | 69.6% |
| 2019 Q4 | 92.3% | 6.6% | 71.5% |
| 2020 Q1 | 86.9% | 7.2% | 68.4% |
| 2020 Q2 | 81.3% | 7.5% | 63.9% |
| 2020 Q3 | 83.9% | 10.4% | 63.8% |
| 2020 Q4 | 85.5% | 9.7% | 65.3% |
| 2021 Q1 | 82.7% | 13.3% | 59.4% |
| 2021 Q2 | 87.1% | 10.4% | 58.4% |
| 2021 Q3 | 86.1% | 10.6% | 53.1% |
| 2021 Q4 | 90.7% | 7.1% | 53.0% |
| 2022 Q1 | 91.5% | 6.0% | 51.6% |
| 2022 Q2 | 89.4% | 6.8% | 56.0% |
| 2022 Q3 | 88.0% | 6.9% | 53.3% |
| 2022 Q4 | 81.9% | 9.8% | 54.1% |
| 2023 Q1 | 77.6% | 8.5% | 53.5% |
| 2023 Q2 | 86.8% | 8.1% | 58.5% |
| 2023 Q3 | 82.0% | 9.2% | 59.0% |
| 2023 Q4 | 83.4% | 10.2% | 59.8% |
| 2024 Q1 | 90.4% | 7.1% | 58.8% |
| 2024 Q2 | 94.0% | 4.5% | 64.4% |
| 2024 Q3 | 88.4% | 8.9% | 64.2% |
| 2024 Q4 | 82.4% | 9.3% | 65.6% |
| 2025 Q1 | 85.2% | 8.7% | 62.1% |
| 2025 Q2 | 83.5% | 8.0% | 65.0% |
| 2025 Q3 | 85.3% | 10.0% | 62.5% |
| 2025 Q4 | 85.5% | 7.5% | 64.7% |
| 2026 Q1 | 79.7% | 14.1% | 60.6% |
| 2026 Q2 | 81.3% | 13.6% | 62.7% |
Share of applications granted
Chelmsford against England
- Chelmsford
- England
Show data
| Quarter | Chelmsford | England |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 Q1 | 87.0% | 85.1% |
| 2008 Q2 | 85.4% | 86.1% |
| 2008 Q3 | 90.0% | 86.3% |
| 2008 Q4 | 88.8% | 85.3% |
| 2009 Q1 | 91.8% | 85.9% |
| 2009 Q2 | 90.3% | 86.8% |
| 2009 Q3 | 94.4% | 87.4% |
| 2009 Q4 | 88.1% | 86.9% |
| 2010 Q1 | 86.7% | 87.0% |
| 2010 Q2 | 89.3% | 88.0% |
| 2010 Q3 | 91.1% | 87.7% |
| 2010 Q4 | 87.4% | 87.5% |
| 2011 Q1 | 92.8% | 87.9% |
| 2011 Q2 | 94.0% | 88.5% |
| 2011 Q3 | 92.0% | 88.3% |
| 2011 Q4 | 95.4% | 88.3% |
| 2012 Q1 | 92.2% | 88.2% |
| 2012 Q2 | 92.3% | 89.2% |
| 2012 Q3 | 93.9% | 89.0% |
| 2012 Q4 | 90.2% | 88.9% |
| 2013 Q1 | 93.3% | 89.8% |
| 2013 Q2 | 96.2% | 90.6% |
| 2013 Q3 | 92.2% | 90.3% |
| 2013 Q4 | 91.8% | 89.6% |
| 2014 Q1 | 92.0% | 89.8% |
| 2014 Q2 | 97.1% | 90.5% |
| 2014 Q3 | 95.2% | 90.0% |
| 2014 Q4 | 95.2% | 89.2% |
| 2015 Q1 | 96.5% | 89.3% |
| 2015 Q2 | 94.7% | 90.2% |
| 2015 Q3 | 97.2% | 90.0% |
| 2015 Q4 | 94.3% | 89.2% |
| 2016 Q1 | 93.8% | 90.0% |
| 2016 Q2 | 93.9% | 90.3% |
| 2016 Q3 | 96.2% | 90.2% |
| 2016 Q4 | 93.8% | 89.7% |
| 2017 Q1 | 96.4% | 89.9% |
| 2017 Q2 | 95.4% | 90.5% |
| 2017 Q3 | 92.1% | 90.0% |
| 2017 Q4 | 94.6% | 90.1% |
| 2018 Q1 | 94.6% | 90.5% |
| 2018 Q2 | 92.8% | 91.0% |
| 2018 Q3 | 92.0% | 91.2% |
| 2018 Q4 | 89.4% | 90.5% |
| 2019 Q1 | 91.7% | 90.3% |
| 2019 Q2 | 91.8% | 91.0% |
| 2019 Q3 | 89.2% | 90.6% |
| 2019 Q4 | 89.3% | 89.8% |
| 2020 Q1 | 89.2% | 89.9% |
| 2020 Q2 | 93.8% | 90.2% |
| 2020 Q3 | 90.7% | 90.6% |
| 2020 Q4 | 89.7% | 90.3% |
| 2021 Q1 | 91.5% | 90.9% |
| 2021 Q2 | 93.8% | 91.2% |
| 2021 Q3 | 90.5% | 91.0% |
| 2021 Q4 | 87.1% | 90.1% |
| 2022 Q1 | 86.1% | 90.0% |
| 2022 Q2 | 88.4% | 90.4% |
| 2022 Q3 | 85.1% | 89.8% |
| 2022 Q4 | 83.7% | 89.4% |
| 2023 Q1 | 84.8% | 89.3% |
| 2023 Q2 | 84.5% | 89.2% |
| 2023 Q3 | 79.6% | 88.6% |
| 2023 Q4 | 82.4% | 88.2% |
| 2024 Q1 | 77.8% | 88.2% |
| 2024 Q2 | 84.9% | 89.1% |
| 2024 Q3 | 88.9% | 89.4% |
| 2024 Q4 | 86.8% | 88.6% |
| 2025 Q1 | 84.7% | 89.3% |
| 2025 Q2 | 87.9% | 90.4% |
| 2025 Q3 | 91.1% | 90.1% |
| 2025 Q4 | 92.5% | 90.1% |
| 2026 Q1 | 89.3% | 90.6% |
| 2026 Q2 | 86.9% | 91.0% |
How long decisions took
Householder decisions over the last 12 months
- Within 8 weeks83.0%
- 8 to 13 weeks5.6%
- 13 to 26 weeks0.1%
- Over 26 weeks0.0%
- Extension of time agreed11.2%
Show data
| Time taken | Decisions |
|---|---|
| Within 8 weeks | 605 |
| 8 to 13 weeks | 41 |
| 13 to 26 weeks | 1 |
| Over 26 weeks | 0 |
| Extension of time agreed | 82 |
Appeals
- Decided
- 16
- Allowed
- 25.0%
- Median wait
- 12 weeks
Householder appeals to the Planning Inspectorate decided in the same 12 months. England: 34.4% allowed.
Refusals overturned at appeal
3.7% of refusals were later overturned at appeal (July 2021 to June 2026): 24 appeals allowed against 637 refusals.
Split decisions count as half.
16th lowest of 299 planning authorities. England: 8.9% (July 2021 to June 2026).
Householder refusals from MHCLG table PS2; appeals allowed from the Planning Inspectorate. Approximate: appeals decided in the period, which can relate to earlier refusals.
Larger home extensions (prior approval)
Single-storey rear extensions deeper than 4 metres on a detached house (3 metres otherwise), up to 8 metres (6 metres), can use prior approval instead of a planning application, except in conservation areas, National Landscapes and other protected areas.
Of 22 larger extension notifications between July 2025 and June 2026, 20 needed no approval, 1 was approved and 1 was refused.
Fewer than 10 decided in the period.
Figures as first published (provisional).
MHCLG live table PDR 1.
Enforcement
9 planning enforcement notices issued in the year to June 2026.
0.11 per 1,000 homes, against 0.17 across England. 137th highest of 294 planning authorities.
Covers all types of development, not only extensions.
MHCLG table P130; homes from the VOA Council Tax stock of properties.
Protected areas
27 conservation areas: Battlesbridge Conservation Area, Boreham - Church Road Conservation Area, Boreham - Roman Road/Plantation Road Conservation Area, Broomfield Conservation Area, Chelmer And Blackwater Navigation Conservation Area, Chelmsford Baddow Road And River Can Conservation Area, Chelmsford Central Conservation Area, Chelmsford John Keene Memorial Homes Conservation Area, Chelmsford Moulsham Street Conservation Area, Chelmsford New London Road Conservation Area, Chelmsford Springfield Green Conservation Area, Chelmsford St Johns Hospital Conservation Area and 15 more.
24 Article 4 areas: Ash Tree Stud, Little Waltham, Battlesbridge Conservation Area, Bicknacre Road, East Hanningfield/Danbury, Cedar Park, Graces Lane, Little Baddow, Culverts Farm, Boreham And Whitwells Farm, Little Baddow, Hill House, Rettendon, Hollybred Farm, Little Baddow, Land Adjacent 37 The Dell, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, Land Adjoining A132, Rettendon, Land At Butlers Farm, Main Road, Broomfield, Land At Humber Road, Lawn Lane, Meon Close & Waveney Drive, Land At Meon Close, Wear Dr, Boyne Dr, Waveney Dr & Tees Rd and 12 more.
Both can remove permitted development rights, so check with the council before relying on them. Permitted development rules
To check one postcode for a conservation area, listed buildings nearby, flood zone and radon, use the address check.
planning.data.gov.uk.
Builders
1,230 registered building and trade firms in 2026, 14.9 per 1,000 homes, about 0.6 householder decisions per firm a year.
39th highest of 294 planning authorities. England median: 10.1 per 1,000 homes and 0.5 decisions per firm.
Counts VAT or PAYE registered firms only, rounded to 5 by ONS; self-employed builders below the VAT threshold aren't included.
ONS UK Business Counts; homes from the VOA Council Tax stock of properties; decisions from MHCLG table PS2.
Compared with neighbouring councils
Decisions and approvals in the year to June 2026; overturns over each council's appeal window; builders per 1,000 homes in 2026.
Decided within 8 weeks, no extension
- Chelmsford83.0%
- Basildon65.4%
- Braintree78.1%
- Brentwood35.2%
- Epping Forest71.7%
- Maldon55.3%
- Rochford56.2%
- Uttlesford78.6%
- England62.7%
Granted
- Chelmsford90.0%
- Basildon88.5%
- Braintree91.6%
- Brentwood85.5%
- Epping Forest76.6%
- Maldon88.9%
- Rochford83.9%
- Uttlesford81.6%
- England90.5%
Refusals overturned at appeal
- Chelmsford3.7%
- Basildon6.9%
- Braintree9.9%
- Brentwood7.0%
- Epping Forest8.5%
- Maldon11.9%
- Rochford7.7%
- Uttlesford8.6%
- England8.9%
Registered building firms per 1,000 homes
- Chelmsford14.9
- Basildon20.4
- Braintree15.6
- Brentwood18.4
- Epping Forest25.0
- Maldon20.9
- Rochford19.8
- Uttlesford18.0
- England median10.1
Questions about planning in Chelmsford
How long does planning permission take in Chelmsford?
Chelmsford decided 83.0% of householder applications within 8 weeks without an extension in the year to June 2026, against 62.7% across England.
Is my house in a conservation area in Chelmsford?
27 conservation areas: Battlesbridge Conservation Area, Boreham - Church Road Conservation Area, Boreham - Roman Road/Plantation Road Conservation Area, Broomfield Conservation Area, Chelmer And Blackwater Navigation Conservation Area, Chelmsford Baddow Road And River Can Conservation Area, Chelmsford Central Conservation Area, Chelmsford John Keene Memorial Homes Conservation Area, Chelmsford Moulsham Street Conservation Area, Chelmsford New London Road Conservation Area, Chelmsford Springfield Green Conservation Area, Chelmsford St Johns Hospital Conservation Area and 15 more. Most councils publish a conservation area map showing whether a street is inside one.
How many builders are there in Chelmsford?
1,230 registered building and trade firms in 2026, 14.9 per 1,000 homes, about 0.6 householder decisions per firm a year. Counts VAT or PAYE registered firms only, rounded to 5 by ONS; self-employed builders below the VAT threshold aren't included.
Do I need planning permission for an extension in Chelmsford?
Many extensions can be built under permitted development without an application, but conservation areas and Article 4 directions can remove those rights, so check whether your address is in a conservation area or covered by an Article 4 direction before relying on them. Do you need planning permission?
Property prices and energy performance in Chelmsford
Homes sold July 2023 to June 2026, matched to the floor area and energy rating on their Energy Performance Certificate.
Median price per m²
£4,588
7,188 sales
18% above East of England
Homes sold rated EPC A to C
51.9%
Median energy score 69
0.7 points below East of England
Value added by extending, per m²
£2,465
19.0% on the sale price
22% above East of England
Energy upgrade, no extension
+3.2%
Sale-price uplift when the energy score rose 5+ points
1.0 points below East of England
The median home sold in Chelmsford was £400,000 for 86 m² of floor space. Price per m² is up 34% since 2015 (£3,412 to £4,587 per m², 2025). Across all 57,940 homes with a certificate, 53.7% are rated A to C on their latest one.
513 houses here were extended between two sales (second sale 2016 to 2026), adding a median 33 m². They sold for a median 19.0% more than similar unextended houses, £2,465 for each m² added. Will an extension pay for itself here?
Medians from HM Land Registry sale prices and MHCLG Energy Performance Certificates; groups under 30 sales or 50 extended houses are not shown. These describe past sales across many homes, not a valuation of any one. How these are worked out
Next steps for your extension
Get new blog posts by email
One email each time we publish a new post on project managing your build. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.