King’s Lynn and West Norfolk planning statistics
Householder applications decided in the year to June 2026, compared with the rest of England.
How long does planning permission take in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk?
King’s Lynn and West Norfolk decided 87.0% of householder applications within 8 weeks without an extension in the year to June 2026, against 62.7% across England.
King’s Lynn and West Norfolk is highlighted on the map. See on the map
Within 8 weeks, no extension
87.0%
20th of 297
24.3 points faster than England
Granted
94.8%
87th of 297
4.3 points higher than England
Extension of time
10.3%
20th of 297
22.0 points lower than England
Decisions (12 months)
478
King’s Lynn and West Norfolk decided 478 householder applications in the year to June 2026, granting 94.8%.
87.0% were decided within 8 weeks with no extension, against 62.7% across England (20th of 297 for speed).
A further 10.3% were decided under an extension of time agreed with the applicant.
That is up from 83.0% a year earlier.
Of 7 householder appeals decided in the same period, 0.0% were allowed.
How quickly decisions are made
King’s Lynn and West Norfolk against England, share of householder decisions each quarter
- Within 8 weeks, no extension
- Extension of time
- England, within 8 weeks
Show data
| Quarter | Within 8 weeks, no extension | Extension of time | England, within 8 weeks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Q1 | 96.7% | 0.0% | 89.5% |
| 2008 Q2 | 94.6% | 0.0% | 89.4% |
| 2008 Q3 | 96.3% | 0.0% | 89.7% |
| 2008 Q4 | 97.0% | 0.0% | 90.3% |
| 2009 Q1 | 97.9% | 0.0% | 90.3% |
| 2009 Q2 | 92.1% | 0.0% | 91.7% |
| 2009 Q3 | 94.7% | 0.0% | 91.4% |
| 2009 Q4 | 93.2% | 0.0% | 91.0% |
| 2010 Q1 | 94.0% | 0.0% | 88.8% |
| 2010 Q2 | 94.3% | 0.0% | 89.8% |
| 2010 Q3 | 92.5% | 0.0% | 88.4% |
| 2010 Q4 | 97.1% | 0.0% | 87.7% |
| 2011 Q1 | 94.3% | 0.0% | 86.4% |
| 2011 Q2 | 97.1% | 0.0% | 85.9% |
| 2011 Q3 | 93.3% | 0.0% | 84.9% |
| 2011 Q4 | 92.6% | 0.0% | 84.9% |
| 2012 Q1 | 88.5% | 0.0% | 83.7% |
| 2012 Q2 | 90.3% | 0.0% | 84.2% |
| 2012 Q3 | 90.6% | 0.0% | 82.9% |
| 2012 Q4 | 90.6% | 0.0% | 85.2% |
| 2013 Q1 | 97.1% | 0.0% | 85.7% |
| 2013 Q2 | 89.8% | 0.0% | 86.3% |
| 2013 Q3 | 90.4% | 0.0% | 85.3% |
| 2013 Q4 | 90.6% | 0.0% | 86.3% |
| 2014 Q1 | 90.9% | 0.0% | 85.4% |
| 2014 Q2 | 94.9% | 0.0% | 84.9% |
| 2014 Q3 | 96.1% | 0.0% | 82.5% |
| 2014 Q4 | 94.4% | 0.0% | 82.1% |
| 2015 Q1 | 91.5% | 4.3% | 80.4% |
| 2015 Q2 | 92.2% | 2.6% | 80.6% |
| 2015 Q3 | 96.9% | 1.9% | 79.2% |
| 2015 Q4 | 90.2% | 5.3% | 80.0% |
| 2016 Q1 | 88.0% | 5.3% | 78.3% |
| 2016 Q2 | 79.9% | 5.0% | 79.8% |
| 2016 Q3 | 77.4% | 6.2% | 77.7% |
| 2016 Q4 | 80.8% | 7.1% | 78.0% |
| 2017 Q1 | 82.9% | 9.3% | 77.3% |
| 2017 Q2 | 77.2% | 12.0% | 78.5% |
| 2017 Q3 | 75.1% | 11.1% | 76.1% |
| 2017 Q4 | 85.0% | 11.1% | 77.1% |
| 2018 Q1 | 79.7% | 17.0% | 73.7% |
| 2018 Q2 | 80.0% | 15.0% | 74.0% |
| 2018 Q3 | 87.2% | 10.6% | 72.7% |
| 2018 Q4 | 81.8% | 17.0% | 72.7% |
| 2019 Q1 | 80.9% | 14.2% | 69.9% |
| 2019 Q2 | 78.3% | 20.0% | 72.1% |
| 2019 Q3 | 73.8% | 23.8% | 69.6% |
| 2019 Q4 | 81.1% | 17.5% | 71.5% |
| 2020 Q1 | 76.9% | 22.4% | 68.4% |
| 2020 Q2 | 51.1% | 48.1% | 63.9% |
| 2020 Q3 | 68.9% | 30.6% | 63.8% |
| 2020 Q4 | 67.0% | 30.3% | 65.3% |
| 2021 Q1 | 61.2% | 37.7% | 59.4% |
| 2021 Q2 | 43.7% | 54.9% | 58.4% |
| 2021 Q3 | 48.3% | 49.1% | 53.1% |
| 2021 Q4 | 51.4% | 45.8% | 53.0% |
| 2022 Q1 | 50.0% | 45.0% | 51.6% |
| 2022 Q2 | 38.8% | 55.7% | 56.0% |
| 2022 Q3 | 25.7% | 73.1% | 53.3% |
| 2022 Q4 | 42.2% | 57.8% | 54.1% |
| 2023 Q1 | 44.4% | 53.8% | 53.5% |
| 2023 Q2 | 32.7% | 60.7% | 58.5% |
| 2023 Q3 | 31.4% | 64.4% | 59.0% |
| 2023 Q4 | 50.4% | 47.5% | 59.8% |
| 2024 Q1 | 54.8% | 43.0% | 58.8% |
| 2024 Q2 | 70.4% | 29.0% | 64.4% |
| 2024 Q3 | 77.3% | 20.7% | 64.2% |
| 2024 Q4 | 85.1% | 12.4% | 65.6% |
| 2025 Q1 | 84.7% | 13.0% | 62.1% |
| 2025 Q2 | 84.7% | 12.7% | 65.0% |
| 2025 Q3 | 85.7% | 14.3% | 62.5% |
| 2025 Q4 | 89.0% | 11.0% | 64.7% |
| 2026 Q1 | 87.3% | 8.2% | 60.6% |
| 2026 Q2 | 86.0% | 7.9% | 62.7% |
Share of applications granted
King’s Lynn and West Norfolk against England
- King’s Lynn and West Norfolk
- England
Show data
| Quarter | King’s Lynn and West Norfolk | England |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 Q1 | 93.4% | 85.1% |
| 2008 Q2 | 96.2% | 86.1% |
| 2008 Q3 | 97.7% | 86.3% |
| 2008 Q4 | 98.2% | 85.3% |
| 2009 Q1 | 97.9% | 85.9% |
| 2009 Q2 | 94.2% | 86.8% |
| 2009 Q3 | 97.7% | 87.4% |
| 2009 Q4 | 96.2% | 86.9% |
| 2010 Q1 | 94.0% | 87.0% |
| 2010 Q2 | 97.1% | 88.0% |
| 2010 Q3 | 95.9% | 87.7% |
| 2010 Q4 | 95.0% | 87.5% |
| 2011 Q1 | 96.7% | 87.9% |
| 2011 Q2 | 99.3% | 88.5% |
| 2011 Q3 | 96.0% | 88.3% |
| 2011 Q4 | 96.7% | 88.3% |
| 2012 Q1 | 99.2% | 88.2% |
| 2012 Q2 | 97.9% | 89.2% |
| 2012 Q3 | 91.4% | 89.0% |
| 2012 Q4 | 91.4% | 88.9% |
| 2013 Q1 | 97.8% | 89.8% |
| 2013 Q2 | 97.8% | 90.6% |
| 2013 Q3 | 98.5% | 90.3% |
| 2013 Q4 | 98.0% | 89.6% |
| 2014 Q1 | 97.5% | 89.8% |
| 2014 Q2 | 97.5% | 90.5% |
| 2014 Q3 | 95.5% | 90.0% |
| 2014 Q4 | 96.0% | 89.2% |
| 2015 Q1 | 95.0% | 89.3% |
| 2015 Q2 | 97.4% | 90.2% |
| 2015 Q3 | 98.1% | 90.0% |
| 2015 Q4 | 99.2% | 89.2% |
| 2016 Q1 | 98.5% | 90.0% |
| 2016 Q2 | 98.7% | 90.3% |
| 2016 Q3 | 98.9% | 90.2% |
| 2016 Q4 | 95.5% | 89.7% |
| 2017 Q1 | 93.6% | 89.9% |
| 2017 Q2 | 96.2% | 90.5% |
| 2017 Q3 | 94.7% | 90.0% |
| 2017 Q4 | 95.4% | 90.1% |
| 2018 Q1 | 99.3% | 90.5% |
| 2018 Q2 | 96.1% | 91.0% |
| 2018 Q3 | 97.8% | 91.2% |
| 2018 Q4 | 95.6% | 90.5% |
| 2019 Q1 | 96.5% | 90.3% |
| 2019 Q2 | 98.3% | 91.0% |
| 2019 Q3 | 96.9% | 90.6% |
| 2019 Q4 | 98.6% | 89.8% |
| 2020 Q1 | 97.0% | 89.9% |
| 2020 Q2 | 97.0% | 90.2% |
| 2020 Q3 | 99.4% | 90.6% |
| 2020 Q4 | 99.5% | 90.3% |
| 2021 Q1 | 98.4% | 90.9% |
| 2021 Q2 | 97.7% | 91.2% |
| 2021 Q3 | 99.1% | 91.0% |
| 2021 Q4 | 96.7% | 90.1% |
| 2022 Q1 | 96.7% | 90.0% |
| 2022 Q2 | 98.4% | 90.4% |
| 2022 Q3 | 97.1% | 89.8% |
| 2022 Q4 | 95.6% | 89.4% |
| 2023 Q1 | 97.0% | 89.3% |
| 2023 Q2 | 96.0% | 89.2% |
| 2023 Q3 | 93.1% | 88.6% |
| 2023 Q4 | 85.6% | 88.2% |
| 2024 Q1 | 88.1% | 88.2% |
| 2024 Q2 | 90.7% | 89.1% |
| 2024 Q3 | 90.7% | 89.4% |
| 2024 Q4 | 91.3% | 88.6% |
| 2025 Q1 | 92.4% | 89.3% |
| 2025 Q2 | 96.8% | 90.4% |
| 2025 Q3 | 96.4% | 90.1% |
| 2025 Q4 | 91.5% | 90.1% |
| 2026 Q1 | 95.5% | 90.6% |
| 2026 Q2 | 95.6% | 91.0% |
How long decisions took
Householder decisions over the last 12 months
- Within 8 weeks87.0%
- 8 to 13 weeks2.7%
- 13 to 26 weeks0.0%
- Over 26 weeks0.0%
- Extension of time agreed10.3%
Show data
| Time taken | Decisions |
|---|---|
| Within 8 weeks | 416 |
| 8 to 13 weeks | 13 |
| 13 to 26 weeks | 0 |
| Over 26 weeks | 0 |
| Extension of time agreed | 49 |
Appeals
- Decided
- 7
- Allowed
- 0.0%
- Median wait
- 12 weeks
Householder appeals to the Planning Inspectorate decided in the same 12 months. England: 34.4% allowed.
Refusals overturned at appeal
6.9% of refusals were later overturned at appeal (July 2021 to June 2026): 12 appeals allowed against 174 refusals.
84th lowest of 299 planning authorities. England: 8.9% (July 2021 to June 2026).
Householder refusals from MHCLG table PS2; appeals allowed from the Planning Inspectorate. Approximate: appeals decided in the period, which can relate to earlier refusals.
Larger home extensions (prior approval)
Single-storey rear extensions deeper than 4 metres on a detached house (3 metres otherwise), up to 8 metres (6 metres), can use prior approval instead of a planning application, except in conservation areas, National Landscapes and other protected areas.
Of 10 larger extension notifications between July 2025 and June 2026, 8 needed no approval, 0 were approved and 2 were refused.
Fewer than 10 decided in the period.
Figures as first published (provisional).
MHCLG live table PDR 1.
Enforcement
8 planning enforcement notices issued in the year to June 2026.
0.10 per 1,000 homes, against 0.17 across England. 145th highest of 294 planning authorities.
Covers all types of development, not only extensions.
MHCLG table P130; homes from the VOA Council Tax stock of properties.
Protected areas
44 conservation areas: BOUGHTON CONSERVATION AREA, BRANCASTER CONSERVATION AREA, BURNHAM MARKET Conservation Area, BURNHAM NORTON Conservation Area, BURNHAM OVERY STAITHE Conservation Area, BURNHAM OVERY the MILLS Conservation Area, BURNHAM OVERY TOWN Conservation Area, BURNHAM THORPE Conservation Area, CASTLE ACRE CONSERVATION AREA, CASTLE RISING CONSERVATION AREA, Dersingham Conservation Area, DOCKING CONSERVATION AREA and 32 more.
12 Article 4 areas: Coastal area Heacham, Coastal area Snettisham, Holme next the Sea, Kings Lynn Conservation Area, Land at Lodge Farm Ringstead Road Holme next the Sea, Land at Reffley Wood Kings Lynn, Land north of Lighthouse Lane Old Hunstanton, Land North of Whiteacres Elmside Emneth, New Houghton Conservation Area, Plot 10 Arlington Park Middleton, South Beach Road Hunstanton and Summerfields Beach Road Snettisham.
Both can remove permitted development rights, so check with the council before relying on them. Permitted development rules
To check one postcode for a conservation area, listed buildings nearby, flood zone and radon, use the address check.
planning.data.gov.uk.
Builders
895 registered building and trade firms in 2026, 11.7 per 1,000 homes, about 0.5 householder decisions per firm a year.
90th highest of 294 planning authorities. England median: 10.1 per 1,000 homes and 0.5 decisions per firm.
Counts VAT or PAYE registered firms only, rounded to 5 by ONS; self-employed builders below the VAT threshold aren't included.
ONS UK Business Counts; homes from the VOA Council Tax stock of properties; decisions from MHCLG table PS2.
Compared with neighbouring councils
Decisions and approvals in the year to June 2026; overturns over each council's appeal window; builders per 1,000 homes in 2026.
Decided within 8 weeks, no extension
- King’s Lynn and West Norfolk87.0%
- East Cambridgeshire72.6%
- Fenland79.1%
- South Holland64.4%
- Breckland80.0%
- North Norfolk60.3%
- West Suffolk53.3%
- England62.7%
Granted
- King’s Lynn and West Norfolk94.8%
- East Cambridgeshire91.2%
- Fenland93.7%
- South Holland86.2%
- Breckland98.2%
- North Norfolk96.1%
- West Suffolk95.6%
- England90.5%
Refusals overturned at appeal
- King’s Lynn and West Norfolk6.9%
- East Cambridgeshire10.3%
- Fenland12.5%
- South Holland8.5%
- Breckland13.3%
- North Norfolk5.6%
- West Suffolk8.6%
- England8.9%
Registered building firms per 1,000 homes
- King’s Lynn and West Norfolk11.7
- East Cambridgeshire14.3
- Fenland11.6
- South Holland11.5
- Breckland10.0
- North Norfolk8.5
- West Suffolk11.1
- England median10.1
Questions about planning in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk
How long does planning permission take in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk?
King’s Lynn and West Norfolk decided 87.0% of householder applications within 8 weeks without an extension in the year to June 2026, against 62.7% across England.
Is my house in a conservation area in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk?
44 conservation areas: BOUGHTON CONSERVATION AREA, BRANCASTER CONSERVATION AREA, BURNHAM MARKET Conservation Area, BURNHAM NORTON Conservation Area, BURNHAM OVERY STAITHE Conservation Area, BURNHAM OVERY the MILLS Conservation Area, BURNHAM OVERY TOWN Conservation Area, BURNHAM THORPE Conservation Area, CASTLE ACRE CONSERVATION AREA, CASTLE RISING CONSERVATION AREA, Dersingham Conservation Area, DOCKING CONSERVATION AREA and 32 more. Most councils publish a conservation area map showing whether a street is inside one.
How many builders are there in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk?
895 registered building and trade firms in 2026, 11.7 per 1,000 homes, about 0.5 householder decisions per firm a year. Counts VAT or PAYE registered firms only, rounded to 5 by ONS; self-employed builders below the VAT threshold aren't included.
Do I need planning permission for an extension in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk?
Many extensions can be built under permitted development without an application, but conservation areas and Article 4 directions can remove those rights, so check whether your address is in a conservation area or covered by an Article 4 direction before relying on them. Do you need planning permission?
Property prices and energy performance in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk
Homes sold July 2023 to June 2026, matched to the floor area and energy rating on their Energy Performance Certificate.
Median price per m²
£2,942
5,925 sales
25% below East of England
Homes sold rated EPC A to C
39.0%
Median energy score 65
13.6 points below East of England
Value added by extending, per m²
£1,717
21.2% on the sale price
15% below East of England
Energy upgrade, no extension
+7.5%
Sale-price uplift when the energy score rose 5+ points
3.3 points above East of England
The median home sold in King’s Lynn and West Norfolk was £265,000 for 88 m² of floor space. Price per m² is up 48% since 2015 (£1,972 to £2,924 per m², 2025). Across all 56,378 homes with a certificate, 40.0% are rated A to C on their latest one.
350 houses here were extended between two sales (second sale 2016 to 2026), adding a median 34 m². They sold for a median 21.2% more than similar unextended houses, £1,717 for each m² added. Will an extension pay for itself here?
Medians from HM Land Registry sale prices and MHCLG Energy Performance Certificates; groups under 30 sales or 50 extended houses are not shown. These describe past sales across many homes, not a valuation of any one. How these are worked out
Next steps for your extension
Get new blog posts by email
One email each time we publish a new post on project managing your build. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.